<![CDATA[Defamer: Naked Celebs]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/defamer.com.png <![CDATA[Defamer: Naked Celebs]]> http://defamer.com/tag/naked celebs http://defamer.com/tag/naked celebs <![CDATA[ Jessica Alba Is Not Naked In This Month's Playboy ]]> alba-playboy.jpgOutraged that Playboy sneakily obtained an Into the Blue promotional photo of client Jessica Alba in a bikini and slapped it on the cover of an issue in which the actress does not expose so much as an ankle, the Scary Hollywood Lawyers of Lavely and Singer have fired off an angry letter to the skin mag expressing their extreme displeasure with their tactics, and in the process, revealed a more than passing familiarity with the magazine's nudie customs. As always, The Smoking Gun has the goods:

...since Playboy's inception, Playboy has established a known custom and practice (and an expectation with and among the public) that any woman whose photograph is featured on the cover appears in a nude or semi-nude pictorial in that month's issue. In featuring Ms. Alba's photograph on the cover of Playboy's March Issue, it is clear that Playboy's intent was to create a false belief and/or expectation among the public that Ms. Alba voluntarily appeared in the nude or semi-nude and that a revealing pictorial of her is contained in Playboy's March Issue. Also, Playboy is old sealed in plastic whereby the public cannot view the actual contents of the magazine absent purchasing the magazine, and, therefore, must rely on Playboy's actual or implied advertising as to the contents of the magazine as presented by the magazine's cover. Consistent with Playboy's practice of displaying a "bunny" watermark logo on its cover girls (who appear nude within the magazine), Playboy has placed the "bunny" logo on the lower right breast of Ms. Alba on the bikini top in the subject photo, thereby altering said photograph and undertaking a blatant and egregious affirmative action to cause the general public to conclude that Ms. Alba had consented to this use and appears nude within the magazine.

We'd like to thank Alba's counsel for pointing out the very subtle bunny watermark hiding on Alba's breast, which we definitely missed upon our first viewing, and which you can see if you click the above image. And for those who might have bought the issue and been disappointed by the lack of Alba-related skin, there are probably enough mentions of "Alba," "nude," and "semi-nude" from which to derive enough jollies to justify your purchase.

]]>
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:47:29 PST Mark http://defamer.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=157555&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Jude's Lawyers Not Interested In Penis Debate ]]> law-package-s.jpgThe Gawker Media Legal Department (comprised entirely of an intern who bought an LSAT prep book but never took the exam) informs us that Jude Law's lawyers are not interested in fostering the scintillating debate about the actor's endowment. We've removed the offending images and replaced them with the one you see in this post, harkening us all back to a time when we were debating whether or not his member was perhaps too impressive, not a possible disappointment. God, it looked like he could fit two nannies onto that thing! Sigh. Those were the days.

]]>
Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:15:46 PDT Mark http://defamer.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=118262&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Overthinking Jude Law's Penis ]]> Rather than join the "shower or grow-er" debate of yesterday, the folks at Salon decide to attack Jude Law's penis from a different angle, namely Why It Doesn't Matter If The Famous Actor Has A Wee Tallywacker: [you may have to watch an ad to read the story]

The good news:

What turns us on is not perfect images of supersize beefcake, oiled and ready to please. What works for us is intimacy, or the illusion thereof. And that's the illusion these photos bring, precisely because it's a shot no one would ever pose for — Jude Law, sans fluffer. It jibes with the most precious images from our most private memories, not only just before, but just after. In other words, those pictures are hot because when we look at them, we're not thinking of Jude Law, we're thinking of you: Our husbands, our boyfriends, not the strangers but the men we've known.

If there's anything we'd like to avoid intellectualizing, it is Jude Law's schlong. Why can't we all share a nice laugh over the pictures, and allow ourselves us to feel slightly better about our own terribly unfabulous lives, if just for a cheap moment, by imagining that maybe, just maybe, we live in a world in which a man with riches, fame, looks so good he turns us gay for 10 seconds each time we gaze into his eyes, a hot actress girlfriend, and a horny child care provider with loose morals, has not also been blessed with twelve rigid inches of nanny-punishing manhood? We liked the world so much better yesterday, before all the thinking.

]]>
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:05:10 PDT Mark http://defamer.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=118105&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ In Defense Of Jude Law's Penis ]]> We at Defamer are committed to fostering constructive, thought-provoking debate. Shortly after posting this morning's item about the seemingly disappointing reality of Jude Law's dangling nanny-bait captured by a paparazzo's lens, some readers wrote in to the defend the naughty actor's member, advancing this crucial discussion through both a contrarian eyewitness account and an imperfect simulation of the controversial photo's conditions:

· "FYI- Jude appeared in a Broadway play with Kathleen Turner called INDISCRETIONS. There was a rather long scene in which he appeared on stage fully nude. While perhaps people are correct in saying he is no Tommy Lee (who is?) he certainly has nothing to be ashamed of. He is very well-endowed. I think the picture just caught him at a bad angle. The camera can lie, but a fifth row orchestra seat can't."

· "I saw the unexpurgated pic of Jude bent forward, nude. Just got out of the shower, dropped my hairbrush on the floor, and halfway back up stopped and saw that my substantial package was as wee as a boy's. When you bend forward, the package draws up — try it in front of a mirror! It's pure hydraulics. That said, we need to GIVE JUDE ANOTHER CHANCE."

Other theories yet to be discussed: Law tucked some of "it" between his legs before pulling on his swimsuit, or that the photographed scene actually depicts Law in the act of checking his pants pockets for a couple of misplaced inches.

Excuse us while we go wash our brain in a tub full of boiling bleach while daydreaming about preseason football.

UPDATE: We can't believe we forgot about "evidence" from our own archive. We must've suppressed those memories.

]]>
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:58:33 PDT Mark http://defamer.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=117862&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The World Laughs At Jude Law's Nanny-Poking Stick ]]> law-nude.jpgYesterday, the inboxes of various media types (and some fake-media blogger-types like us—thanks!) filled up with images of Jude Law inadvertently exposing his infamous nanny-tenderizer to a lucky paparazzo. Today, Page Six points at Law's possibly shrinkage-afflicted unit, throws back its collective head, and laughs and laughs.

In snapshots that recall George Costanza's infamous "shrinkage" episode on "Seinfeld," the love-rat actor's meager manhood is on full display as he changes into a swimsuit outside his mother Maggie Law's house in Vaudelnay, France.

"He's no Tommy Lee, that's for sure," sighed one unimpressed publicist who viewed copies of the paparazzi pix obtained by PAGE SIX.

Law's rep, Simon Halls, declined to discuss his client's apparently puny package, telling us: "Oh, please! The guy is on vacation in France with his kids. People need to give him a little bit of a break."

Couldn't the flack at least have offered something in a, "Come on! Jude's a grower, not a show-er!"? Instead we now have a new, delightfully non-sequitur excuse for disappointing people unlucky enough to see us naked: "Whatever! I'm vacationing in France with the kids!"

Oh, and if you want to see the pics, they're here (nsfw). We're not letting the little guy dangle around here.

]]>
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:37:36 PDT Mark http://defamer.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=117808&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Naked Famous People Round-Up: The Youthful Indiscretions Of Demi And Michelle ]]> demi-moore-young.jpgWe've received so many e-mails about recently available pictures of a couple of naked, famous people that we're finally giving in and rounding them up here (and yup, they're all over the place now, without sources, but this is the only way we can stop the e-mails). To wit: A fine round of prurient jollies can be had checking out a young, unclothed Demi Moore (link NSFW), long before she let herself be filled to the brim with Ashton Kutcher's seed, or by taking a peek at skinnydipping libertine Michelle Rodriguez, soon after she let herself be filled to the brim with alcohol at the Skybar in Miami. Perhaps the only thing more satisfying than stolen moments with these barenaked celebrities photos is the opportunity to clumsily force some symmetry on their sudden, unlreated appearance. Enjoy!


[Ed.note—We were so much more excited about these before the Great Broadband Outage of August 16th. Now? Eh.]

]]>
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:34:30 PDT Mark http://defamer.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=117683&view=rss&microfeed=true